Nov 10, 2017 in Law

Supreme Court Justice

Scalia Antonin, born in 1936 was an associate Justice in the Supreme Court from 1986 in Trenton. He was a Harvard Law school graduate in the 60, and he taught law at the university of Chicago and Virginia for more than fifteen years. Later on, he was named to the federal Courts of Appeal in Columbia district by President Reagan in 1982. Four years later, he was lucky to be nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. Scalia was outspoken, conservative and also a prominent proponent: characters that made him an ideal candidate for the Supreme Court as all the decisions made by a judge are based on unique meaning. Scalia took libertarian positions and was willing to overturn some unwanted precedents.

Life History of the Justice

Scalia Antonin Gregory was born on March 11th 1936 in Trenton, New Jersey and he has served as a Justice in the court for the longest time compared to other judges. He is known as an outspoken jurist as well as a rational anchor of the courts conservative corner as numerous unanimous votes. Scalia attended public grade school and later on he was admitted to a Catholic high school in Trenton. After graduating from high school, he attended Georgetown University where he got his undergraduate degree before proceeding to Harvard for his Bachelor of Law Degree. He got his first job at a Cleveland law firm where he performed his duties for six years before deciding to teach law at the university. Scalia also served in Ford and Nixon administrations in minor agencies, before being promoted to the post of assistant attorney general. A large portion of his career was spent teaching law at the University of Chicago where he also became the first faculty adviser of the fledging Federalist Association. In 1982, President Ronald Reagan appointed Scalia along with others as judges to the United States Court Of Appeals in the Columbia District circuit.

Scalia Tenure in the Court

The first opinion that Scalia embraced was the philosophy of textualism, which is also referred to as the original meaning in trying to interpret the federal statutes and the United States constitution. Scalia also opposed the speculation regarding the intension of those who draft constitution and the opinion of the court to interpret the constitution figuratively. He believed in the rule of law, and he put so much emphasizes on legal writings and speeches. Scalia was also involved in the first amendment of protecting the United States flag from burning. Additionally, he played a vital role in the sixth amendment where he says that the rights of the experts involved in performing DNA analysis should be protected. Most of The Scalia’s opinions are authored to reflect views that courts should be predicable to lawmakers. He fights for a transparent judiciary that is not excessive formal to the public with his strongest wish being to clear the brush.

Discussion and Analysis of the Judicial Philosophy of the Justice

Scalia is known to be a conservative judicial commissioner, and the most outspoken member of the court. He is also known for his dissents with regard to the idea of the evolving constitution. He disagrees with other justices that have used the evolving constitution ideology on making decisions that are not based on the constitution. He opposed ignorance or use of figurative speech requesting that the judicial system be clear on how they make their ruling toavoid being prejudiced. He authored various opinions explaining how he was not a strict constructionist because he never applied the constitution provisions narrowly, but he however criticized some approaches that seemed dysfunctional.

A Discussion and Analysis of Justice on Criminal Procedure

Being a conservative and believing in and practice the philosophy of the constitutional initial contents, he had a major effect in the justice system. Scalia was involved in various cases that relied heavily on the constitution. He believes that the death penalty is a constitutional aspect, and he does not agree with other justice systems that try to put an age bracket on who should face the penalty. Scalia thinks it is unconstitutional no to give the death penalty to an offender who deserves it because they are below 18 years at the time of committing the offence. He argued that the courts had failed to show justice by not exerting constitutional demands by referring to such rulings as judicial overreaching. Scalia believed that courts should never be afraid to correct their mistakes and stop failing the nation by practicing unconstitutional law.


Scalia is a Supreme Justice known for being so conservative with people, but has the ability to discuss the constitution in depth in an effort to ensure the right message is passed. He believes in justice that is drafted in the constitution, and if any new matter should be introduced, it should be drafted and approved by the constitution. If people want abortion, a law should then be passed to legalize it, and if the death penalty should have age bracket or medical reservation, he believes that the constitution should be clear about it. The law should not have short cuts for some people and deny others the same privilege. Instead, it should be clear and not desist from favoring anyone because of age, gender, race or their mental state when committing the crime.

Related essays

Chat with Support