Nov 10, 2017 in Review

Gun Germs and Steel

Diamond disputes that European evolution is not so much as a result of inventiveness, but of opportunity and obligation. Civilization is not formed out of greater intelligence but is the consequence of a series of progression, each made feasible by certain prerequisites. Even though, Diamond is not the first to contemplate on this intricate issue; his response is revolutionary. He advocates that the “supremacy” of the Europeans were primarily owed to their surroundings. He attributes their achievement to a timely chance and environmental dissimilarity of the continents.

In the book, Guns, Germs, and Steel, Diamond tries to enlighten why the European people have continued to exist and dominate others, although in dispute against the thought that their supremacy is due to any type of European scholar, ethical, or natural hereditary authority. He disputes that the gap in supremacy and technology amid human civilization began in environmental variations, which are augmented by a variety of positive response loops. Whilst literary or hereditary dissimilarity have favored Eurasians, he declares that these advantages came about due to the pressure of geography on the social order and civilization, and were not intrinsic in the European genomes. Diamond is surprised how the Europeans can have so much authority and superior technology whereas the rest of the world is still underdeveloped.

People have accredited Europe as a notable accomplishment in the area of money matters and political affairs to things such as ethnic features and genetic dissimilarity. He details the invasion by Francisco Pizarro and only some men over the Inca monarch through the use of advanced steel artillery and shield, horses and cavalry. This nonetheless was simply the immediate grounds leading to the invasion.

He also highlights the value of growth of “food production,” a phrase he employs to cover the domestication of untamed animals and plant life, and their development for human use. Improved harvest yield allow bigger concentration of the population while animals give their skin for warmth, transportation, and animal-derived microorganisms such as smallpox, for which limited resistance had developed and which have assisted take-overs. Even though, there were several inhabitant epidemics of tropical infections, this did not discourage the raiding Europeans.

Some regions, even now, are populated by hunter-gatherer civilization while others are urbanized into cultured nations and kingdoms. Diamond observes the result of the environment on the society being a diminutive cluster of hunter-gatherers or a vast kingdom; and based on this, he discover that the weather can alter how inhabitants exist. The decision to change from hunter-gatherer was a gradual one and is inclined by the decrease in accessibility of wild animals, esteem, and intellectual approach.

Diamond admits that his outlook is one of environmental determinism in which Europeans are preferred simply because they had more starting resources and good surroundings. He discovers why Europe came to take over the productive Crescent and China. It was ecologically weak, and it had gone through desertification, wearing down, and deforestation. It furthermore had no intrinsic benefit over other districts once they had expanded food production. He admits that intellectual dissimilarity in people may also play a responsibility in the determining of history and make it impulsive that ultimate outcomes display receptive reliance on preliminary circumstances.

Related essays